4.21.2006

A Great Article by One of my Favorite Ladies

LIE DOWN WITH STRIPPERS, WAKE UP WITH PLEAS
April 19, 2006

However the Duke lacrosse rape case turns out, one lesson that absolutely will not be learned is this: You can severely reduce your chances of having a false accusation of rape leveled against you if you don't hire strange women to come to your house and take their clothes off for money. Also, you can severely reduce your chances of being raped if you do not go to strange men's houses and take your clothes off for money. (Does anyone else detect a common thread here?)

And if you are a girl in Aruba or New York City, among the best ways to avoid being the victim of a horrible crime is to not get drunk in public or go off in a car with men you just met. While we're on the subject of things every 5-year-old should know, I also recommend against dousing yourself in gasoline and striking a match.

Everyone makes mistakes, especially young people, but the outpouring of support for the victims and their families is obscuring what ought to be a flashing neon warning for potential future victims. Whenever a gun is used in a crime, there are never-ending news stories about how dangerous guns are. But these girls go out alone, late at night, drunk off their butts, and there's nary a peep about the dangers of drunk women on their own in public. It's their "right." Yes, of course no one "deserves" to die for a mistake. Or to be raped or falsely accused of rape for a mistake. I have always been unabashedly anti-murder, anti-rape and anti-false accusation — and I don't care who knows about it!

But these statements would roll off the tongue more easily in a world that so much as tacitly acknowledged that all these messy turns of fate followed behavior that your mother could have told you was tacky. Not very long ago, all the precursor behavior in these cases would have been recognized as vulgar — whether or not anyone ended up dead, raped or falsely accused of rape. But in a nation of people in constant terror of being perceived as "judgmental," I'm not sure most people do recognize that anymore.

It shouldn't be necessary to point out that girls shouldn't be bar-hopping alone or taking their clothes off in front of strangers, and that young men shouldn't be hiring strippers. But we live in a world of Bill Clinton, Paris Hilton, Howard Stern, JuliaRoberts in "Pretty Woman," Democratic fund-raisers at the Playboy Mansion and tax deductions for entertaining clients at strip clubs. This is an age in which the expression "girls gone wild" is becoming a redundancy.

So even as the bodies pile up, I don't think the message about integrity is getting through. The liberal charge of "hypocrisy" has so permeated the public consciousness that no one is willing to condemn any behavior anymore, no matter how seedy. The unstated rule is: If you've done it, you can't ever criticize it — a standard that would seem to repudiate the good works of the Rev. Franklin Graham, Malcolm X, Whittaker Chambers and St. Paul, among others.

Every woman who has had an abortion feels compelled to defend abortion for all women; every man who's ever been at a party with strippers thinks he has to defend all men who watch strippers; and every Democrat who voted for Bill Clinton feels the need to defend duplicity, adultery, lying about adultery, sexual harassment, rape, perjury, obstruction of justice, kicking the can of global Islamo-fascism down the road for eight years and so on.

This is crazy. (I can say that because I've never been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Although I did test positive for "Olympic fever" once.) In no area except morality would a sane person believe he can't criticize something stupid because he's done it. How about: If you've ever forgotten to fill up your car and run out of gas, you must forevermore defend a person's right to ignore the gas gauge. Or if you've ever forgotten to wear a coat in cold weather and caught a cold, henceforth you are obliged to encourage others not to dress appropriately in the winter. This deep-seated societal fear of being accused of "hypocrisy" applies only to behavior touching on morals.

But we're all rotten sinners, incapable of redemptionon our own. The liberal answer to sin is to say: I can never pay this back, so my argument will be I didn't do anything wrong. The religion of peace's answer is: I've just beheaded an innocent man — I'm off to meet Allah! I don't know what the Jewish answer is, but I'm sure it's something other than, "therefore, what I did is no longer bad behavior" — or the Talmud could be a lot shorter. The Christian answer is: I can never pay this back, but luckily that Christ fellow has already paid mydebt.

COPYRIGHT 2006 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

So true. So true. Matt and I were just talking about some of these same things last night. We miss you and Jason!

Anonymous said...

Thank you for posting this timely column. Ms. Coulter is one of the Three Smartest Women In America.

Why is it so difficult to understand the obvious? Have we been so brow beaten by the P.C. Patrol that we don't recognize things we know are wrong let alone speak up against them? I'm as Libertarian as the next guy, but there is still right and wrong.

What we need is another good dose of the Gospel. Ms. Coulter knows this, as do the other two Three Smartest Women In America.

Tonight on "24": Jack Bauer saves the country. Chloe O' saves Jack Bauer. They don't let the knuckleheads get in their way. We should learn from them.

Anonymous said...

This is absolutely a disgusting post. No woman should be blamed for being victimized.

As for a good article, check out what your buddy Jack is up to:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/05/01/danforth_says_gay_marriage_ban_silly_idea/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+News

Natalie said...

Oh Jackson, how I've missed your pointless comments

Anonymous said...

I'm telling brother Jack that you think he's pointless!!!

Natalie said...

So, Jackson, you apparently know Jack personally? Also, I was not saying that he was pointless, but that your comments are- deducing that Jack is pointless from my commment is poor logic. If you had read the article closely you would know that Anne was not blaming women for being victimized but rather calling out for people to begin thinking before they put themselves in dangerous and compromising situations-taking responsibility for their choices rather than saying that they can do whatever they want and not ever expect a bad outcome.

Anonymous said...

I think maybe you should take a hard look in the mirror at yourself and your surroundings before posting an article like this. I am floored that you would even remotely imply with this post that women who are raped or people who are killed are all making "poor choices". This article reeks of judgment and ignorance, and your posting of it echoes that sentiment.

Anonymous said...

I understand the reasoning behind this arguement Ann creates, but where is the compassion? Did you not just say you served a different god from those military funeral protestors? Because this article sounds like it has been written by one of them.

Where do you draw the line between "she should not have been raped, she did nothing in poor judgement" to "well, she shouldn't have gone to that party"?

This thinking is the reason so many women are afraid to share their experiences with others.

Even if you're not standing at that picket line, the judgement is still there.

Anonymous said...

Hey Nat!

Just wanted to let you know that I didn't post those comments above! I don't post anonymously. I guess you have other really smart people reading your blog ;)

Anonymous said...

Hi Natalie,

I've been reading your blog for some time now and feel obligated to post. I feel really sorry for you and the identity crisis you seem to be experiencing. While you label yourself part of the "Christian Left," (are you serious?) Ann Coulter is one of your favorite women! Insanity! By endorsing this hateful, racist, anti-Semetic, anti-Muslim, homophobic, anti-woman, woman you confirmed what I suspected from reading your earlier posts: that you are a close-minded member of the Christian RIGHT who feels so much guilt for your bigoted beliefs you feel obligated to speak up on behalf of those who you marginalize. As a black, Christian, lesbian I am deeply offended by your messages.

Natalie said...

I am not experiencing an identity crisis of any kind. I don't appreciate being labeled, as I'm sure you wouldn't either, as "closed-minded" especially based solely on the fact that my political views can land on the conservative side. You can assume a lot of things about me because I am a Christian, but it isn't fair, just as I could assume a lot of things about you as a black woman or a lesbian, but I don't because that's not fair and that's not what Jesus does. Jesus stood for truths that were absolute and concrete and the scary thing about our current cultural state is that whenever anyone stands for something as absolute truth, sound moral reasoning, even common sense, they are looked down on as closed minded because they stand firmly in what they believe. If the culture and its expectancy of tolerance for all things and acceptance of relative truth remains the standard I fear we are going to have a rude awakening at some point.